Roads ? - where we're going, we don't need roads ...
multible blocksizes in an Oracle Database | ORA600
ORA600 content Content RSS
Oracle ORA600 News RRSS Oracle News RSS
ORA600 blog Blog RSS
ORA600 blog Blog Atom

User login

multible blocksizes in an Oracle Database


In short: Not useful.

More elaborated: Messy, waste of memory-space and admin-effort.


Let me explain:

I've come across this discussion again and I considered myself lucky that Charles Hooper has done all the research already.

I'm summarizing his findings here:

Multiple Blocksizes do NOT offer Any Proven Advantage.

The theory about more efficient indexes and better managed cache is good, and I dont deny there is good reasoning behind it. But in practice, having multiple blocksizes and multiple db-nK-caches doesnt make a difference.

It is a waste of the extra (little bit of) work.

And most likely, you end up wasteing cache-space because you hard-divide the cache space into chunks and you prevent the Oracle LRU-mechanism from utilizing all available cache as it sees fit.

Of course, you may be the exception that proves the rule, and I would like to hear from you in that case, but until further notice, I'll stick with my motto:

Simple = Better.



Howto's
See DUDE primer for info

Get Support

Europe

Belgium :
Kurt Van Meerbeeck
ORA600 bvba
E-mail
dude@ora600.be
Cell : +32 495 580714

Denmark :
Henrik Bjerknæs Rasmussen
Service & Support Manager
Miracle AS
E-mail :
hra@miracleas.dk
Cell: +45 53 747 110


North America

USA :
Tim Gorman
Evdbt Inc
E-mail
tim@evdbt.com
Cell : +1 303 885 4526

USA :
Daniel Fink
OptimalDBA
E-mail
daniel.fink@optimaldba.com
Cell : +1 303 808 32 82

Canada :
Pythian
E-mail
dude@pythian.com
Contact


Latin America

Brazil :
HBtec
E-mail
dude@hbtec.com.br
Cell : +55 47 88497639
Contact


Africa

South Africa :
Kugendran Naidoo
NRG Consulting
E-mail
k@nrgc.co.za
Cell : +27 82 7799275


East Asia Pacific

Australia
Alex Gorbachev
Pythian Australia
E-mail
dude@pythian.com
Cell : +61 2 9844 5431